MEMORIA, MORALITY, AND MNEMONIC HEGEMONY OF ROMAN EMPERORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14795/j.v6i3.445Keywords:
Memory sanctions, mnemonic hegemony, morality, legitimation, Roman PrincipateAbstract
The importance of memory in the formation of identity cannot be overestimated. This goes for individuals, but also for collective bodies. As a multifaceted and multidimensional phenomenon, memory in a retrospective way preserves past events, which contributes to explain and construct the present, but also has prospective claims. This makes memory a powerful force to construct or demolish identities in several domains (for example, political, social, cultural), on several levels (such as private and public; individual and collective), and in various time frames (past, present, future). This article focuses on the capacity of posthumous memory to serve as a locus for negotiation, confirmation, competition, and contestation of political power by mnemonic hegemons. The main point I aim to make is that mnemonic hegemons could ‘collectificate’ (= make into a collective issue) (personal) rivalry over power by turning it into a collective issue. Negative posthumous commemoration was one of the mechanisms put in play here. The intended effect was to frame a distinction between the victor/we/state and the victim/anti-social he. How it worked out, depended on the power balance. Two cases, one from the early Imperial period, and one dating to the early third century, when the imperial system had become institutionalized, will be discussed to demonstrate such collectification of commemoration, and which explicit and implicit information about the power balance this implied.
Downloads
References
ALLÉLY 2012
Allély, A., La déclaration d'hostis sous la République romaine (Bordeaux : Ausonius).
ANDO 2000
Ando, C., Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press)
ASSMANN / CZAPLICKA 1995
Assmann, J. / Czaplicka, J., Collective Memory and Cultural Identity, New German Critique 65, 125-133. Original publication in: J. Assmann and T. Hölscher (1988), Kultur und Gedächtnis (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), 9-19.
ASSMANN / WEINBERG / WINDISCH 1998
Assmann, A. / Weinberg, M. / Windisch, M. (eds) 1998, Medien des Gedächtnisses (Stuttgart-Weimar: Metzler).
ASSMANN 2008
Assmann, J., Communicative and Cultural Memory, in: A. Erll and A. Nünning (eds), Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter), 109-118.
BURASELIS 1989
Buraselis, K., ΘΕΙΑ ΔΩΡΕΑ. Μελετες πάνω στην πολιτική της δυναστείας των σεβαστων και την Constitutio Antoniniana (Athens). Translated in 2007 as Theia dōrea: das göttlich-kaiserliche Geschenk : Studien zur Politik der Severer und zur Constitutio Antoniniana (Wien: Austrian Acadamy of Science Press).
COOLEY 2009
Cooley, A.E., Res Gestae Divi Augustis. Text, Translation, and Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
DRIJVERS 2007
Drijvers, J.W., Damnatio memoriae in het antieke Rome. Een impressie, Historisch Tijdschrift Groniek, 7-20.
EDER 2006
Eder, W., Cornelius’ [I 90], in: Hubert Cancik and Helmuth Schneider (eds), Brill’s New Pauly. Antiquity Volumes. Available at: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/cornelius-e305350.
ELVERS 2006
Elvers, K.-L., Marius, in: H. Cancik and H. Schneider (eds), Brill’s New Pauly. Antiquity Volumes (Brill Online). Available at: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/marius-e723970.
EVANS 1994
Evans, R.J., Gaius Marius: A Political Biography (Pretoria: University of South Africa).
FLOWER
Flower, H.I., Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
FLOWER
Flower, H.I., Rethinking “Damnatio Memoriae”: The Case of Cn. Calpurnius Piso Pater in AD 20, Classical Antiquity 17.2, 155-187.
FLOWER 2006
Flower, H.I., The Art of Forgetting. Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press).
GALINSKY 2014
Galinsky, G.K., Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory (Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press).
GALINSKY / LAPATIN 2015
Galinsky, G.K. / Lapatin, K.D.S. (eds), Cultural Memory in the Roman Empire, Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum. Gowing, A.M., Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
GOWING 2005
Gowing, A.M., Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
GRADEL 2002
Gradel, I., Emperor Worship and Roman Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
HEKSTER 2008
Hekster, O.J., Rome and its Empire, AD 193-284 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
HEKSTER 2014
Hekster, O.J. , Son of two fathers? Trajan and the adoption of emperorship in the Roman Empire, The History of the Family 19.3, 380-392.
HEKSTER 2015
Hekster, O.J., Emperors and Ancestors. Roman Rulers and the Constraints of Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
VAN DEN HENGEL 2009
Hengel, L. van den, Imago. Romeinse keizerbeelden en de belichaming van gender (Hilversum: Verloren).
HÖLSCHER 2001
Hölscher, T., Die Alten vor Augen. Politische Denkmäler und öffentliches Gedächtnis im republikanischen Rom, in: G. Melville (ed.) Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (Köln-Weimar-Wien: Böhlau Verlag), 183-211.
INNES 2011
Innes, D.C., The Panegyricus and Rhetorical Theory, in P. Roche (ed.), Pliny's Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 69-84.
JOHNE 2008
Johne, K.-P. (ed.), Die Zeit der Soldatenkaiser, (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).
KEAVENEY 20052
Keaveney, A.P., Sulla. The Last Republican (London - New York: Routledge).
KIENAST 19962
Kienast, D., Römische Kaisertabelle. Grundzüge einer römischen Kaiserchronologie (Darmstadt)
KLEIN 2000
Klein, K.L., On the emergence of 'memory' in historical discourse, Representations 69, 127-150.
KRÜPE 2011
Krüpe, F., Die Damnatio memoriae. Über die Vernichtung von Erinnerung. Eine Fallstudie zu Publius Septimius Geta (198-211 n. Chr.) (Gutenberg: Computus Druck Satz & Verlag).
KÜHN 1985
Kühn, W., Plinius der Jüngere – Panegyricus (Darmstadt).
LÖHR 2006
Löhr, W.A., Portrait Gallery, in: H. Cancik and H. Schneider (eds), Brill’s New Pauly. Antiquity Volumes. Available at: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/portrait-gallery-ct-e15203950.
MANUWALD 2011
Manuwald, G., Ciceronian Praise as a Step towards Pliny's Panegyricus, in P. Roche (ed.), Pliny's Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 85-103.
MESOUDI / WHITEN / LALAND 2004
Mesoudi / A., Whiten, A. / Laland, K.N., Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of the Origin of Species, Evolution 58.1, 2004, 1–11.
MOLDEN 2015
Molden, B., Resistant pasts versus mnemonic hegemony: On the power relations of collective memory, Memory Studies 9.2, 125-142.
NAIRNE / PANDEIRADA / THOMPSON 2008
Nairne, J.S., Pandeirada, J.N.S., Thompson, S.R., Adaptive Memory. The Comparative Value of Survival Processing, Psychological Science 19.2, 176-180.
RICHARDSON 1991
Richardson, J.S., Imperium Romanum: Empire and the Language of Power, in Journal of Roman Studies 81, 1-9.
RICOEUR 2004
Ricoeur, R., Memory, History, Forgetting (Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press).
ROCHE 2011
Roche, P. (ed.), Pliny's Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
ROWE 2013
Rowe, G., Reconsidering the Auctoritas of Augustus, Journal of Roman Studies 103, 1-15
RÜPKE 1995
Rüpke, J., Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
SANTANGELO 2007
Santangelo, F., Sulla, the Elites and the Empire: A Study of Roman Policies in Italy and the Greek East (Leiden-Boston: Brill).
SEGESTEN / WÜSTENBERG 2017
Segesten, A.D. / Wüstenberg, J. 2017, Memory studies: The state of an emergent field, Memory Studies 10.4, 1-16.
STEIN-HÖLKESKAMP 2013
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E., Macht, Memoria und Monumente: Marius, Sulla und der Kampf um den öffentlichen Raum, Klio - Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte 95.2, 429-446.
SUTTON 2012
Sutton, J., Memory, in: Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/memory/.
STUTTARD / MOORHEAD 2012
Stuttard, D. / Moorhead, S., 31 BC: Antony, Cleopatra and the Fall of Egypt (British Museum Press).
TAMM 2013
Tamm, M. 2013, Beyond History and Memory: New Perspectives in Memory Studies, History Compass 11.6, 458-473.
TOTA / HAGEN 2015
Tota, A.L. / Hagen, T., Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies (London-New York: Routledge).
TUMBLETY 2013
Tumblety, J. (ed.), Memory and History: Understanding Memory as Source and Subject (London-New York: Routledge).
TULVING / CRAIK 2000
Tulving, E. / Craik, F.I.M. 2000, The Oxford Handbook of Memory (Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press).
VARNER 2000
Varner, E.R. (ed.), From Caligula to Constantine. Tyranny & Transformation in Roman Portraiture (Atlanta, Georgia).
VARNER 2004
Varner, E.R., Mutilation and Transformation. Damnatio Memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture, Monumenta Graeca et Romana X (Leiden: Brill).
VITALE 2013
Vitale, M., Kleopatra auf einer Inschrift aus Ägypten und auf Münzprägungen syrischer Poleis: Das Schweigen der Erinnerungsmedien nach Actium? Klio - Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte 95.2, 455–470.
VITTINGHOF 1936
VITTINGHOF, F., Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Untersuchungen zur “damnatio memoriae” (Berlin: Speyer).
WOOLF 2012
Woolf , G., Rome. An Empire’s Story (Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press).
AUTHOR
AUTHOR
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, we use CC BY-NC-ND license (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs) wich only allowing others to download your works and share them with others as long as they credit you, but they can’t change them in any way or use them commercially.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
