THE USE OF LOCAL IDENTITIES IN THE MONETARY PROPAGANDA OF THE POMPEIANS DURING THE WAR WITH CAESAR 49-48 BC

Authors

  • Kamil Kopij Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14795/j.v2i3.123

Keywords:

Late Roman Republic, Republican Coinage, Pompey the Great, Caesar, Propaganda

Abstract

The issue of audience targeting is crucial in studies of contemporary propaganda. Meanwhile, it is usually ignored in analysis of Roman propaganda despite the fact that studies of ancient rhetoric clearly shows that speakers were well aware that they must use a different language when performing in front of different audiences. The primary aim of this paper is to consider the possibility of targeting propaganda messages encoded on coins struck by the Pompeians (RRC 444, RRC 445/1-3) during the war with Caesar. The analysis of the imagery placed on these coins may indicate that different types were in the first instance intended for the inhabitants of Epirus and Greece (RRC 444, RRC 445/2), Sicily (RRC 445/1) and West Asia Minor (RRC 445/3). Considering the fact that those were the most important areas of recruitment for the Pompeians, it is possible that by placing images that referred to them they tried to influence locals also in this way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BATTENBERG 1980

Battenberg, Ch. Pompeius und Caesar: Persönlichkeit und Programm in ihrer Münzpropaganda, Diss. Marburg.

BELLONI 1974

Belloni, G.G. Significato storico-politico delle figurazione e delle scritte delle monete da Augusto a Traiano, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.1, 997-1144.

BELLONI 1976

Belloni, G.G., Monete romane e propaganda. In: Sordi, M. (ed.), I canali della propaganda nel mondo antico, 131-59.

BROUGHTON 1952

Broughton, T.R.S., The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. II: 99 B.C.- 31 B.C, New York: American Philological Association.

BURGON 1837

Burgon, Th., Inquiry into the Motive which influenced the Ancients in their Choice of the various Representations which we find stamped on their Money, Numismatic Journal 1,, 97-131 (free access via e.g. Google Books).

BUTTREY 1972

Buttery, T.V., Vespasian as moneyer, Numismatic Chronicle 12, 89-109.

COARELLI 1993

Coarelli, F.,Hercules Pompeianus, Aedes. In: Stainby, E.M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae, vol 3, Roma: Edizioni Quasar.

CRAWFORD 1974

Crawford, M.H., The Roman Republican Coins, London: Cambridge University Press.

CRAWFORD 1983

Crawford, M.H., Roman Imperial Coin Types and the Formation of Public Opinion. In: Brooke C.N.L. et alii (eds) Studies in Numismatic Method Presented to Philip Grierson, 47-64.

CRAWFORD 1985

Crawford, M.H., Coinage and money under the Roman Republic: Italy and the Mediterranean economy, London: Methuen.

FARNEY 2007

Farney, G.D., Ethnic identity and aristocratic competition in Republican Rome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

FURTWÄNGLER 1895

Furtwängler, A., Masterpieces of Greek sculpture, a series of essays on the history of art, London: W. Heinemann.

GALINSKY 1981

Galinsky, K., Vergil's Romanitas and his adaptation of Greek Heroes, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.31.2, 985-1010.

GRANT 1957

Grant, M., Roman Coins as Propaganda, Archaeology 5, 79-85.

GRUEBER 1910

Grueber, H.A., Coins of the Roman Republic in the British Museum. Vol. II: Coinage of Rome (continued), Roman Campania, Italy, the Social War, and the provinces, London: British Museum.

HALL 1980

Hall S., Coding and encoding in the television discourse. In: Hall, S. (ed.), Culture, Media, Language, London: Routledge.

HALLAM 1931

Hallam, G.H., Notes on the Cult of Hercules Victor in Tibur and Its Neighbourhood, Journal of Roman Studies 21, 275-282 DOI: 10.2307/296523

HARLAN 1995

Harlan, M., Roman Republican moneyers and their coins, 63 B.C.-49 B.C., London: Seaby.

HEALTH/BRYANT 2000

Health, R.L./Bryant, J., Human Communication Theory and Research. Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

HEKSTER 2003

Hekster, O.J., Coins and Messages. Audience Targeting on Coins of Different Denominations? In: de Blois L. at alli (eds), The Representation and Perception of Roman Imperial Power, 20-35, Amsterdam: BRILL.

HOLM 1897

Holm, A., Geschichte Siziliens im Alterthum, vol. 3, Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.

HUTTON 1896/1897

Hutton, C.A., On Three Bronze Statuettes, Annual of the British School at Athens 3, 149-155 DOI: 10.1017/S0068245400000800

JONES 1956

Jones, A.H.M., Numismatic and History. In: Carson, R.A.G., Sutherland, C.H.V. (eds), Essays in Roman Coinage Presented to Harold Mattingly, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-33.

KOPIJ 2012

Kopij, K., Propaganda War over Sicily? Sicily in the Roman Coinage during the Civil War 49-45 BC, Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization 16, 167-182.

KUNISZ 1993

Kunisz, A. Rola źródeł numizmatycznych w badaniach nad ideologią i propagandą w państwie rzymskim [The Role of the Numismatic Sources in the Study of Ideology and Propaganda in the Roman State]. In: Kunisz, A. (ed.), Rzym Antyczny. Polityka i pieniądz vol. 1, 54-67.

LAUER 2008

Lauer, J., Money as Mass Communication: U.S. Paper Currency and the Iconography of Nationalism, The Communication Review 11.2, 109-32 DOI: 10.1080/10714420802068359

LITTLEJOHN 2002

Littlejohn, L.W., Theories of human communication, Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth (seventh edition).

MACK 1937

Mack, D., Senatsreden und Volksreden bei Cicero, Diss. Kiel.

MATTINGLY 1960

Mattingly, H., Roman Coins. From the earliest times to the fall of the Western Empire, London: Methuen.

MCQUAIL 2010

McQuail, D., McQuails's Mass Communication Theory, London: SAGE (sixth edition).

MORAWIECKI 1980

Morawiecki L., Propagandowe aspekty mennictwa rzymskiego [Propaganda Aspects of the Roman coinage], Wiadomości Numizmatyczne 24, 1-21.

MORSTEIN-MARX 2004

Morstein-Marx, R., Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

NEWMAN 1990

Newman, R., A Dialogue of Power in the Coinage of Antony and Octavian (44-30 BC), American Journal of Numismatics (Second series) 2, 37-63.

PÉREZ 1986

Pérez, Ch., Monnaie du pouvoir, pouvoir de la monnaie: une pratique discursive originale, le discours figuratif monétaire (1er s. av. J.-C.-14 ap. J.-C.), Paris: Presses Univ. Franche-Comté.

PONTING/EVANS/PASHLEY 2003

Ponting, M., Evans, J. A., Pashley, V., Fingerprinting of Roman Mints using Laser-ablationMC-ICP-MS Lead Isotope Analysis, Archaeometry 45, 591-597.DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-4754.2003.00130.x

RICHARDSON 1992

Richardson jr., L., A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

QUALTER 1962

Qualter T.H., Propaganda and Psychological Warfare, New York: Random House.

SMITH 1854

Smith, W.G., Dictionary of Greek and Roman geography, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.

SUTHERLAND 1959

Sutherland, C.H.V., The intelligibility of Roman coin types, Journal of Roman Studies 49, 46-55, DOI: 10.2307/297622

SUTHERLAND 1983

Sutherland, C.H.V., The Purpose of Roman Imperial Coin Types, Revue numismatique 25, 73-82.

SYDENHAM 1952

Sydenham, E.A, The coinage of the Roman Republic, London: Spink.

WEINSTOCK 1957

Weinstock, S.,Victor and Invictus, The Harvard Theological Review 50, 211-247. DOI: 10.1017/S0017816000020927

ZANKER 1990

Zanker, P., The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

ZARROW 2003

Zarrow, E.M., Sicily and the Coinage of Octavian and Sextus Pompey: Aeneas or the Catanean Brothers?, The Numismatic Chronicle 163, 123-135.

ZIÓŁKOWSKI 1988

Ziółkowski, A. Mummius' Temple of Hercules Victor and the Round Temple on the Tiber, Phoenix 42, 309-313.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-15

How to Cite

THE USE OF LOCAL IDENTITIES IN THE MONETARY PROPAGANDA OF THE POMPEIANS DURING THE WAR WITH CAESAR 49-48 BC. (2015). JOURNAL OF ANCIENT HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.14795/j.v2i3.123

Similar Articles

1-10 of 372

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.